Comments on Profile Post by gaspasser

  1. brencho
    brencho
    i'd take a T3 over a Mj2 for a hd6x0/580. more refined, more detail, awesome speed and impact. they each have their own unique issues with soundstage. still, for =<1k i'd take a T3 over almost anything for hd6x0/580...
    Nov 10, 2017
    Pyruvate, gaspasser, jowls and 2 others like this.
  2. brencho
    brencho
    also Mj2 gives you some versatility. i had a Mj2 when i was almost exclusively using a planar headphone but it sounded totally fine with utopias and sennheisers too. some weird treble fuckery on the Mj, and not quite at the T3 level for dymamic headphones imo.
    Nov 10, 2017
    gaspasser and FlySweep like this.
  3. Melvillian
    Melvillian
    I’ve only heard one MJ2 and it was at schitr and it didn’t sound very clean. Sounded grainy. Maybe it’s the stock Tubes. The T3 just sounds more refined.
    Nov 10, 2017
  4. WNovizar
    WNovizar
    In my humble acquainted-but-ain't-friend opinion, T3 are more of a sidegrade against Mjo2, since you have WE396A tube. As @brencho said, while T3 is more dynamic, the WE396A in Mjo2 gives you much needed soundstage depth
    Nov 11, 2017
    FlySweep likes this.