The Mjolnir 2 thread

Discussion in 'Amplifiers and Combo (DAC/Amp) Units' started by maxedfx, Oct 11, 2015.

  1. cskippy

    cskippy Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2015
    Likes Received:
    611
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Tempe, Arizona
    Most audio engineers aren't deaf, they're just required to smash waveforms into cheese as some call it or their tracks won't be competitive with others for radio play and their services won't be wanted.
     

  2. Dino

    Dino Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Likes Received:
    1,890
    Dislikes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    93
    From what I have read, people in different positions (including mastering engineers) can call the shots on "loudness" for different releases. It is hard to know who is responsible unless I research an individual release and most often not even then.
     
  3. Changeling

    Changeling Tube Slut

    Friend
    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2016
    Likes Received:
    579
    Dislikes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Sweden
    Did you try any other dac than the Chord Mojo together with Mjolnir2? Not having heard the Chord Mojo I can't say for sure that this is your problem, but I'm spending 4-6 hours in the office with HD800 out of Mjolnir2 every day and I can't relate to what you describe.
     
  4. landroni

    landroni Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2016
    Likes Received:
    785
    Dislikes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Yes, I can definitely see how radio considerations could be taken into account for CD releases. But this doesn't account for things like high-res releases on HDtracks or Qobuz, or it seems releases for MQA. I find it confusing that for ostensibly "audiophile" releases loudness tricks are still being commonly employed...
     
    Dino and cskippy like this.
  5. Kattefjaes

    Kattefjaes Mostly Harmless

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2016
    Likes Received:
    2,428
    Dislikes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    London, UK
    That's a good point- the Mojo, despite being quite rolled-off, can have quite prickly treble. It might be worth borrowing a Mimby or similar for a while to compare.
     
  6. Delayeed

    Delayeed Almost "Made"

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2016
    Likes Received:
    105
    Dislikes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Funland
    Yeah, that's what I've been thinking too... I haven't tried any other DAC on it yet. I'm not even 100% sure it's the treble, sometimes feels like it's the lower mid boxyness of the Chord Mojo that is causing discomfort. Really hard to say, I've been struggling to find out what it is exactly.

    Going to upgrade to a Gumby hopefully soon and swap my HD600s to 650s so that should really take care of the fatigue. Ether Cs which are my daily drivers
    have that slight peak in ~10k that the Mjo 2 doesn't hide as well as the Mojo so to speak.
     
  7. Darren G

    Darren G Acquaintance

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2017
    Likes Received:
    27
    Dislikes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, PA
    The Yggy is on its way, so I'll switch that in for the Bimby.

    It's hard to describe what I am hearing over balanced that can be annoying at louder levels. It's a kind of an upper frequency/mid slam/waffling, short in duration, but unpleasant. To be fair though I was quite impressed listening to a live album that normally comes across as distant and lacking in dynamics, but the same has a very pleasant, open, dynamic sound through the MJ2, balanced, HE-500s. So hard to say. Studio recordings have their appeal, but they are also often recorded at high levels (the volume wars), and mixed to be in-your-face. The SE output is more polite/forgiving, but maybe masking some of the transients. Not sure.
     
    a44100Hz likes this.
  8. nachocheese70

    nachocheese70 Rando

    Joined:
    May 10, 2017
    Likes Received:
    5
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    US and China
    From what I've read about Mjolnir (1 and 2), Jason specifically designed it with a circlotron topology. This topology is purely a balanced design and not meant to provide SE output. In Jason's case for convenience for those with SE headphones he summed up the balanced outputs to create an SE output but this will potentially have negative effects on sound quality.

    I'm not saying the SE output will/should sounds worse than balanced (I have a live and let live mentality), but I will say from a technical perspective the Mjolnir was not designed to be used SE. There are many other amps using many other topology that are designed for SE output.

    In this case, it maybe worth trying out different tubes to get the balanced out to sound "right" to your ears.

    Regarding the suggestion about having hearing checked for unusual sensitivities, this is a good idea (or try DIY). This has nothing to do with hearing loss. I'm at the age I can tell there is a roll off in the upper registers. BUT I still have a wicked sensitivity to 9kHz sounds (always had throughout my life). With Jriver I use a notch PEQ filter to tone it down a little, allowing me to listen to music at an overall higher volume without fatigue. Without EQ, I have to lower the volume a bit to avoid fatigue.

    Anyways my 2 cents,
     
    SnowPuppy and landroni like this.
  9. Darren G

    Darren G Acquaintance

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2017
    Likes Received:
    27
    Dislikes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, PA
    I did receive the balanced cable for the HiFiMan X V2's that I was waiting for, and keeping in mind this is a mellow sounding headphone, I still hear more attack and articulation over balanced, but... on the plus side this is a good match with the tubes I've done all testing with so far. I'm not getting that painful sensation I was getting at times with the HE-500 over balanced.

    Still haven't tried the LISST and I prefer to change one thing at a time, at least listen for several hours or a day or two before forming strong impressions. So far so good though. I really enjoy these X V2's for their comfort and easy to listen to nature, so I'm pleased it's pairing well with the MJ2 in balanced mode (it's only too bad the X V2s feel cheap for what HiFiMan charges, but they are comfy).

    Anyway I also I did turn on the Lyr 2 once more the other day, listened for an hour, but yea, definitely the MJ2 is a step up. Keeper amp for sure now.
     
    Delayeed likes this.
  10. Darren G

    Darren G Acquaintance

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2017
    Likes Received:
    27
    Dislikes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Pennsylvania, PA
    The Yggy really shows off how good the MJ2 is. If I had any doubts about the amp, they are gone.

    What's really impressive is how quiet and dynamic the amp is even at very low output, and this really comes through with Yggy. The X V2s are quite efficient as well. When you have to turn it up to make it sound dynamic that's one thing, but it's when you can turn it way down and the dynamics and sense of energy come through, impressive. The Yggy vs Bimby comparison really show off how transparent the amp is. Makes you think Schiit actually listens to the products they are building. Great stuff and I think I'll be very happy with this for a long time to come. It's certainly the most musical setup I've ever owned (though the Klipsch KLF-20s with sub can still pull-off rock with impact unlike any headphones I've yet tried, but they can cause fatigue too - this headphone setup is just smooth musical and fun).
     

Share This Page