AES talk seems more objective. I like the conclusion: "all performed similarly, with much more faithful reproduction when the source material was less than -3dBFS."
As an aside, didn't like either dac2 or 3. Sabre was not my cup of tea.
I found the DAC3 unoffensive but flat and not detailed as compared to the PSA DSD & Gungnir Multibit. It does have wonderfully low noise, however, and is compact, has a nice remote, good volume control, etc.
Just wondering.. When you talk about PSA DS, are your impressions based on red book sources (converted to DSD internally or externally) or DSD native ones?
Almost always PCM converted internally. I’ve never found any great benefit to DSDx1 native content. Sometimes I say DSD to mean DirectStream DAC... in case that was confusing.
Shiity digital attenuation and/or extreme digital attenuation. Otherwise everything processed digitally would have artifacts...all those DSP plugins fouling up the music.
Read these "rules" AND introduce
yourself before your first post
Being true to what the artists intended
(opinion / entertainment piece)
Comments on Profile Post by skem