Amphions, Harbeths, Seas Metal Cones, Active Systems

Discussion in 'Speakers' started by Psalmanazar, Nov 7, 2018.

  1. JayC

    JayC Resident Crash Test Dummy

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    980
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Eindhoven
    Could you guys who are calling out all sorts of speakers being brought up on this thread please reccomend a mid range priced speaker that you consider good?

    Now all i know of what not to buy apparently
     
  2. Thad E Ginathom

    Thad E Ginathom Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    14,238
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    India
    I don't know if they are still liked there, but, back in the day when I was drooling over such things, Amphions was a hype train on Gearslutz. When approached without the right protective clothing, a hype train quickly induces the certainty that this is what I have to buy. But I changed trains (and then decided that my hearing no longer merited a hifi wish list), and actually never even got to hear them. Nice to see them revisited.
     
  3. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    89,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    What's your use? How big is the room? What is mid-priced?

    The stuff discussed here is el-rip off. The Amphion especially so since they use inexpensive Seas alum drivers and charge $3000 for their small ones.

    Assemble a kit that comes with cabinets like the Overnight Sensation MTM. The PAP stuff is actually a good deal and should sound good - I demoed a speaker very similar at a Changstar meet years ago.

    Don't mind the idiots here trying to speak authoritatively about speakers from what they heard at an audio show.

    Set up, upstream components, and recordings matter just as much as the speakers. Audio shows tend to use the worst mastered recordings because they happened to be in 2496.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2018
  4. Psalmanazar

    Psalmanazar Most improved member; A+

    Pyrate Slaytanic Cliff Clavin
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    5,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hella overpriced doesn’t mean not legitimately decent. The Amphions school stuff with much higher build costs; they’re just not worth buying unless you think they’re the best thing ever. Parts cost != sound quality.

    Shows use elevator music for a reason. Most of these speakers are awful would fall apart to Slayer.
     
  5. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    89,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    As far as speakers, I do think there is a strong correlation between sound quality and driver quality (which correlates with driver cost.)

    FWIW, the "inexpensive" aluminum Seas are actually on the higher end in terms of cost. It's just that the magnesium version of the Seas is what I would have expected for $3000 / pair speakers for 5.5" drivers.

    But I'm a DIYer who's used both of the aluminum and magnesium Seas, so my expectations are very different. I want to puke when I see BoM 1/10 of retail for mass produced audiophile products. None of these designs employ top secret shit as their marketing brochures would have you believe. Just the same design concepts recycled over and over for 50+ years, with the voicing determined by the crossover / EQ network.

    Any speaker DIY noob would be able to arrive at the exact same sound for $500 total including pre-built cabs. $1000 total for beautiful heroic cabs from Lee Taylor in upstate NY.

    Yes, there is a lot of overpriced stuff that is shit, like Magico. But those are not even worthy of discussion - in fact, they do not exist in my quantum universe.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2018
  6. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    89,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    Umm, those small Amphions fall apart with Jewel and Sarah McLachlan at volume. I doubt they would be suitable for Slayer. But then again, it's possible Slayer has no significant content below 60Hz. I don't know anything about Slayer.

    You don't know WTF you are talking about or either you were listening to music with no content below 70Hz. Or maybe you are like one of those show marketing guys who crank the full rangers wide-banders up and bang their heads to music, while I look back at them funny, wincing to the painful distortion. Your claims are nothing short of fan-boyism bordering on misinformation. Again, don't get me wrong. I love the Ampeggios. Voxactiv makes the best 8" wide banders IMO. But I also understand the limitations of the 8" BLHs.

    There are trade-offs with every design. The Ampeggio is not a design for high SPL in a medium sized 350-400 sq ft room. Best not to delude youself. The Pi with the Pi-bass would be more suitable for high SPL. I have only heard opposing show conditions opinions on those.
     
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2018
  7. Hrodulf

    Hrodulf Prohibited from acting as an MOT until year 2050

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    4,307
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Amphions - overpriced? Well, you're paying the hi-end tax on top of Finnish salaries. I've listened to their biggest d'appolito studio monitors and they were okay, but nothing ground breaking. Pretty sure they use the same tweets as Genelec and the mild waveguide implementation is similar as well. Some people can't stand Gennie treble, my take is that it might have something to do with breakup. It never was a problem for me.

    Technically Amphion claim that there's magic in passive radiators and they run their tweets pretty low at times. Must be why they can struggle at higher SPL's. PR's have the same filtering mech behind them as port tubes, they just use membrane mass instead of piece of air for resonator tuning. PR's shine for tuning where a port would be impractical, but it's not best of sealed and ported enclosures. It's still a 2nd order filter with associated issues. Also PR's have intrinsic THD due to suspension linearity or lack thereof. And they're more expensive than PVC piping.
     
  8. 9suns

    9suns [insert unearned title here]

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2017
    Likes Received:
    1,754
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    EU
    I owned the One15's for 3 months in 2016, with the matching class D amp.
    I've quite liked them at first because they were very coherent sounding, which is not surprising due to the waveguide, 1.6khz xover point and using very similar materials for both drivers (titanium tweeter and aluminum driver) and not as bright as some other speakers with metal drivers I've heard (but they're still on the bright side for me). No port noise was also a plus, because of the passive radiators.

    At first I've thought: "very fast sounding, coherent, no boomy bass"...and hearing the ATC SCM20 changed that opinion, my judgement now is:
    Worse transient response than some well designed speakers with bass reflex loading (not even taking closed boxes into account), because passive radiators have a 36db roll off (!), the notion of fast bass fooled me, but that's because it's a 5 inch driver and drivers of that size don't do bass...it sounds fast because of the lack of weight and the lack of noise from a reflex port, not due to a good transient response.
    They're bright, but not "Grado clusterfuck bright", it's the kind of speaker that measures like a straight line, without peaks or dips, but with brightness added because of the use of metal based drivers.
    I've sold them because:
    - I needed to recover money.
    - I started to dislike the sound, after honeymoon period, it started to fatigue me after 30 mins of listening (I usually listen between 70-85db, rarely I listen at 90db, so I'm kinda a low volume listener).
    - I even bought a (second hand) Xindak "Class A" warmbutt amp to sweeten the thing, but it turned them into a boomy mess, I ended up selling the Amphions with matching Class D amp and Xindak amp to a local studio.

    Having learned my lesson (better said: knowing my preferences better), I'm saving to comission a pair of custom monitors that meet my requirements (polypropene or paper woofer & soft dome tweeter, closed box, external analog active crossover and external class A/B amps, no Class D or DSP crap) :rolleyes:
     
  9. Psalmanazar

    Psalmanazar Most improved member; A+

    Pyrate Slaytanic Cliff Clavin
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    5,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    @purr1n not muh fault amphion and others think sticking two 5" to 8" off the shelf woofers in a box with a veiled but still metal tweeter makes a fullrange tower
    9suns, you might like KH310. Meets your driver, class AB, sealed requirements. You won't get the red lights with your listening levels. SCM 20 is the least British ATC. Bigger ATCs = more British bass = more cancerous

    Yeah they're not actually good dude. I think people reading this should be aware that "decent" = "not bad enough to give to Joe Walsh on a coke bender to chainsaw" != exceptional in any way other than a sort of uniform mediocrity
     
  10. murphythecat

    murphythecat GRU-powered uniformed trumpkin

    Pyrate Banned
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Likes Received:
    1,201
    Trophy Points:
    93
    amphion are just as good as kh310, i personally think they are less veiled

    calling amphion mediocre and then praising kh310 is nonsense. everyone in this thread who HAD both prefered the amphion.
    https://www.gearslutz.com/board/high-end/1006109-amphion-one18-two18-vs-neumann-kh310.html

    clearly, you havent spent enough time on amphion to have a serious opinion

    the amount of pro who have compare both amphion one18 vs kh310 in the same room is a testament that both kh310 and Amphion are at the very least at the same level, most comparison of both will give advantage to Amphion.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2018
  11. Psalmanazar

    Psalmanazar Most improved member; A+

    Pyrate Slaytanic Cliff Clavin
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    5,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol just as good. Fuk outta here with that bs. Kh310 have a shitload more detail due to the sealed box, active crossover not muffling transients even more, and dedicated midrange dome. You just hate bass and love recessed mids and mediocre metal tweeters vs decent soft domes.

    You don’t have to eat the entire bag of Fritos to know what Fritos taste like and evaluate their nutritional worth compared to an apple. Same with meh speakers

    Nobody gives a shit what some people like. Some people like Fritos. Some people like Harbeths...
     
  12. murphythecat

    murphythecat GRU-powered uniformed trumpkin

    Pyrate Banned
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Likes Received:
    1,201
    Trophy Points:
    93
    dude, its not that serious. I personally doubt that if you had both in the room, youd hate the amphion. kh310 are good, amphion are good and harbeth are also good.

    I hate bass? i sold my shl5+ to go with bigger speaker cause my genelec 1037 bass is what I want and no 8 inch can do what a 12 inch do in the bass
     
  13. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    89,962
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    The Seas metal woofers aren't inherently veiled. They are among the best drivers around, a tiny notch below the Accuton ceramics, or equal depending upon implementation. If there is any veil, I'd surmise it's because of the passive crossover. The metal drivers ring like crazy, requiring steep slopes or a few tricks. This means more parts in the crossover which almost always equates to a constriction or veiling of the sound. If this isn't done properly, there's going to be that hint of nasty aluminum pots-and-pans clanging coloration. Moving the crossover to 1600Hz down from a more typical 2-2.2kHz only helps so much. Steep slopes and notch are needed. The magnesium drivers are actually easier to deal with, and the Accuton ceramics even more so, this is why they cost more.

    IMO, the Seas drivers do much better in active systems. DSP is a good way to implement these drivers cheaply and effectively.
     
  14. Senorx12562

    Senorx12562 Case of the mondays

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    3,276
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Bird-watcher's paradise
    This thread has taught me that, since apparently all speakers suck, I no longer need to expend any more energy trying to improve my setup in that area. Since I consider my current setup to be mediocre, apparently I am already way ahead of the game, so... more music it is. Perfect.
     
  15. msommers

    msommers High on Epipens

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2016
    Likes Received:
    2,750
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Calgary, Alberta
    Home Page:
    Welcome to Emo-Fi
     
  16. Psalmanazar

    Psalmanazar Most improved member; A+

    Pyrate Slaytanic Cliff Clavin
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    5,345
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol citing Gearslutz impressions. Head-fi of pro audio.

    Good to know. The Amphions definitely have a sort of "smoothing" compared to the Genelecs I've heard, which use a Seas tweeter. Know of any active speakers that use the Seas metal drivers or is it a diy project only? I know Barefoot uses metal drivers but I'm not sure if they're Seas

    Edit: Unity Audio apparently does. I'll try to check it out sometime.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2018
  17. murphythecat

    murphythecat GRU-powered uniformed trumpkin

    Pyrate Banned
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2016
    Likes Received:
    1,201
    Trophy Points:
    93
    maybe I should open another thread about active systems, but I intent to go this way with my new project.

    I was thinking about a Behringer DCX2496, whats your opinion on the best active xo around?
     
  18. philipmorgan

    philipmorgan Member of the month

    Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    3,790
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    In the wind, so to speak
    Home Page:
    If money were no object I'd go with a MiniDSP DDRC-88D with multiple Gumbies. Or if Dirac not needed/wanted, the nanoDIGI 2x8 B.

    If you didn't mind being reliant on a computer you could do the DSP in software and use one of those Lynx cards to feed multiple DACs.

    Obv this is specific to a digital source system.
     
  19. Highfilter

    Highfilter New

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2018
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    13
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canada
    I was looking into similar active monitors awhile ago and came across these that use SEAS variants: APS Trinity or Aeon, Dutch & Dutch 8c, Grimm Audio LS1, Unity Audio Boulder MkII.
     
  20. Armaegis

    Armaegis Friend

    Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    7,538
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Winnipeg
    The DCX2496 is good and cheap, it's easy to program on the fly without a computer, and there are plenty of mods out there. I've had meh experience with the build quality/reliability though, and static/popping noise problems are common and difficult to diagnose.

    I've tried DBX processors and they are a step up sonically (if you want me to qualify that... uh, it's like going from Dragonfly to Modi 2).
    edit: compared to feeding analog signals into both; I never got a chance to compare feeding digital vs analog with the Behringer, at least not in any controlled scenario where I would have been able to make reasonable judgement calls
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2018

Share This Page