Music Streaming Services

Discussion in 'Computer Audiophile: Software, Configs, Tools' started by rott, Feb 22, 2017.

  1. Metro

    Metro Almost "Made"

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2016
    Likes Received:
    148
    Dislikes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    San Francisco
    And on top of that, many download purchases (at least recordings from the major labels) have sound quality that is even further crippled by an audible watermark (basically a form of DRM).
    https://www.mattmontag.com/music/universals-audible-watermark (the article only mentions streamed music, but customers have discovered that it is in downloaded purchases as well)
    https://www.techdirt.com/articles/2...phile-files-pisses-off-paying-customers.shtml
     
  2. donjoe0

    donjoe0 Rando

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2018
    Likes Received:
    9
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Romania
    Yeah, only just found out about it this past week, haven't had the time to investigate much. I can't say I've heard it in anything I've bought so far, just plain old clipping/overcompression distortion from the Loudness War and/or no-headroom compression.
     
  3. donjoe0

    donjoe0 Rando

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2018
    Likes Received:
    9
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Romania
    To keep it fair, I have to add that I just saw it claimed in the HydrogenAudio forum that AAC encoding can mask certain clipping artifacts while MP3 does not. This could explain *some* cases of Loudness War distortion that I can hear in GPM's MP3s but not in AAC copies bought elsewhere or encoded at my end. (Still doesn't excuse their no-headroom encoding, easily shown by mp3gain, which I always have to use to tone down the loudness in their MP3s, to make sure the decoding step will not produce clipping no matter the decoder.)
     
  4. synthwavefan

    synthwavefan Cluelessly Misogynistic - MOT - LH Labs

    Banned
    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2016
    Likes Received:
    44
    Dislikes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Pandora Premium would be good for someone who literally has no idea about the genre they're listening to. I set my lady friend up with some music on her Pandora (what she uses) and it was very safe, very "popular" hits from related bands (no obscure bands) (still all new to her). Spotify would be better for deep music exploration.
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2018
  5. psuKinger

    psuKinger Rando

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2018
    Likes Received:
    7
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Google Play Music subscriber here. When I switched to it from Rhapsody, I auditioned several other options on Free Trials (Spotify, Tidal, etc), and chose it for reasons that may not be valid/accurate anymore (support for Cast natively within the app makes it play nice with my 4 CCA's I use for Whole-Home-Audio; the lack of a native Android TV app for my NVidia Shields, of which I own several; etc). But I really did/do like the way it incorporates my local music collection automatically, making 320 kbps MP3 copies of all of my 16/44.1 and HDTracks music (first 50,000 songs are free), and it does so automatically by monitoring my NAS and making the upload with no additional action taken on my part.

    I also liked that it uses MP3 natively and not other codecs, as my lossy collection is pretty much entirely Amazon 256 kbps VBR MP3's, and I know other codecs might have advantages over MP3, but those MP3s are what I already own and I wasn't thrilled with the prospects of a service taking those and converting them to some other lossy codec...

    The "added benefit" of getting commercial-free-youtube-Red shouldn't be slept on, either... we're not cordcutters, either, but the amount of quality high-production-value content on youtube is way higher now than it was 10 years ago. It's not just cat videos anymore. And the fact that you get Red for free with GPM is, IMO, a really sweet "perk".
     
  6. Erikdayo

    Erikdayo Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Likes Received:
    386
    Dislikes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    I don’t like that GPM converts AAC to MP3 when uploading. Transcoding a very common lossy format to another lossy format. I find that aspect aggravating. Otherwise it’s a pretty nice service.

    iTunes Match keeps MP3 uploads in MP3 format. Keeps AAC in AAC format. On the other hand it’s not free while uploading to the cloud with Google is.

    I’m definitely interested in trying Qobuz when it launches in the US this fall, but I imagine it’ll be too limited for me to drop Apple Music. Much like Tidal. My ideal service would be similar to Apple Music but with ‘hi res’ options and through an app that doesn’t run as shit as iTunes does on Windows.
     
    yotacowboy and starence like this.
  7. aamefford

    aamefford Nothing like chamberpot coffee

    Friend
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    332
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Between SF and Sac
    I finally gave up on Tidal. My bank threw a fraud hold on them. I cleared it up with the bank, but Tidal’s “customer service” and I use that term very loosely, could never get out of their own way and clear things on their end. I’m not a JZ or hip hop fan, so most of their front page stuff annoyed me (I know, my problem, not theirs). The usual UI complaints, watermark issues, etc. and I just decided the value proposition was too low. We are an Apple centric household, so Apple Music family plan was a no brainer. Everyone in the house for $5 a month less than Tidal for just me.

    So far, Apple Music seems to be good enough sound quality and very convenient. I even stream from phone to rpi Volumio to Gumby to Liquid Crimson and don’t feel the overwhelming urge to bathe immediately afterward. Sure, lossless is better, but 256 AAC definitely appears ”good enough.”
     
    Uri Cohen and Erikdayo like this.
  8. bixby

    bixby Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    1,152
    Dislikes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, Apple Music is pretty decent for casual listening on my walks, for example. I have not tried it on a proper sbaf type HP setup. As soon as I switch over to foobar on my Android though, even through my cheap iems, the difference in quality via an aac download vs lossless wav is apparent. Even with Radiohead, haha

    Then again, it could be how Apple Music App/ Android treats the aac file. Maybe the Apple Music app falls into the same space as those that upsample all content to 96khz within the Android framework, anyone know for sure?

    Still, though, pretty nice for a walk.

    EDIT: After reading @psuKinger post above I discovered YouTube music, free version I suppose. Nice vehicle to sample new stuff at the desktop. eg. they have Robbie Krieger stuff, Apple Music does not. No clue about quality though it seems no worse than watching decent videos on youtube.
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2018
  9. aamefford

    aamefford Nothing like chamberpot coffee

    Friend
    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    332
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Between SF and Sac
    ^^^ Agreed. If I listen to the same song, Apple Music vs. Alac or flac lossless rip back to back, I can tell that the lossless rip is better. I *think* above and beyond expectation bias. In most cases, if I just stream the Apple Music content, I don’t notice any drastic suckage. If I jump to the lossless stuff off the hard drive, I do notice the improvement with lossless. My habit seems to be one or the other, so even with the *good* rig, I am not defiled by lossless source files. Throw on the AirPods and Apple Music becomes stellar. At least as stellar as one can get on AirPods.
     
    bixby and Senorx12562 like this.
  10. Biodegraded

    Biodegraded Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    May 28, 2017
    Likes Received:
    693
    Dislikes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Calgary AB, Canada
    Spotify's download limit for paid subscribers now increased to 10,000 songs on each of up to 5 devices (formerly 3333).
     
  11. yotacowboy

    yotacowboy McRibs Kind of Guy

    Friend
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2016
    Likes Received:
    528
    Dislikes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    NOVA
    Very very interested in trying Qubuz + Roon.
     
  12. Uri Cohen

    Uri Cohen Almost "Made"

    Contributor
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2018
    Likes Received:
    149
    Dislikes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    Jacksonville, FL
    I just canceled my Tidal subscription just so I can get on Qubuz. Still debating about Roon, but when I had my Roon trail, I must admit that controlling three-five sound setups from one tablet is quite appealing (and use one sound setup to troll my roomies with animu music, priceless).
     

Share This Page