shotgunshane’s IEM (custom and universal) recommendations, favorites and classics

Discussion in 'IEMs and Portable Gear' started by shotgunshane, Jun 7, 2016.

  1. peterpangea

    peterpangea New

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2016
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    Hey shotgunshane, ever tried out the Rhapsodio Solars? I'd be interested in how they perform relative to a lot of the IEM heavyweights.
     
  2. shotgunshane

    shotgunshane Floridian Falcon

    Staff Member Pyrate Flathead IEMW
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    6,358
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clear, clear water
    You can check out my HF review here: http://www.head-fi.org/products/rhapsodio-solar/reviews/15906

    It's a very good performer but it's also very bass heavy. You must be a bass-lover/basshead to really appreciate what it has to offer.
     
  3. peterpangea

    peterpangea New

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2016
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Toronto, ON
    If it's so bass heavy, then it's really only good for certain genres right? Any comparison from your perspective to the TG334? I have these currently and don't think of them as overly bass-heavy, even though the general consensus is that the TG334 is on the bassier side.
     
  4. Warrior

    Warrior RIP 2021

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Likes Received:
    746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I listen to mostly basshead IEMS, and I use them for a variety of different genres no issues for me, including classical.
     
  5. Madaboutaudio

    Madaboutaudio Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    545
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Singapore
    the issue with bashead iem is that the bass hump could bleed into vocals causing certain female singers to sound more huskier than intended. Not all basshead iem has this problem.
     
  6. shotgunshane

    shotgunshane Floridian Falcon

    Staff Member Pyrate Flathead IEMW
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    6,358
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clear, clear water
    It's more bass than the TG334, although I think it may be a tighter bass. Solar treble will be a little sweeter and less sharp than I remember of the TG334. All that said I don't think the Solar can touch the FitEar vocals.
     
  7. Warrior

    Warrior RIP 2021

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Likes Received:
    746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Agreed. That's why I search for the best. I have a lot of really nice basshead IEMS that sound amazing in other frequencies. Sonys come to mind, both the ex1000 and EX800st. Ex1000 you really have to eq the shit out of it to get basshead levels, but it's possible and it doesn't lose any of its laser like clarity.

    Tralucent Ref 1 Too is another. Tralucent Plus 5, is similar to the ex1000, but doesn't quite need the same amount of eq.

    I hate when the bass bleeds into the mids. I also prefer sub bass over mid bass. The journey never ends for me. Right now between my 2 tralucent IEMS and the 2 Sonys, I'm extremely happy and really not sure if I will find better.
     
  8. mulolomu

    mulolomu New

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2015
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Still confused, why TG334 sounds so different vs MH334. After long time owning TG334, i moved to MH334, but to my ears, they are totally different sounding, despite they share the same drivers..

    TG334 is bassier and more bloom on mid and upper bass, more sharp at upper mid, more lively. While MH334, is a little bit weaker bass than TG334, but deeper on subbass make it more linier, while maintaining the same vocal performances vs TG334, the upper mid is more linier too but at cost MH didnt sounds as lively as TG, more subdued treble, more rolled off up top, but make it also more fatigue free...overall MH334 is more linier sounding with mid centric sounding. Any members here experiencing the same with me?
     
  9. Warrior

    Warrior RIP 2021

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Likes Received:
    746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Makes sense. Different crossovers, maybe the change the impedance of drivers. I'm sure a lot of manufacturers use some of the same drivers, but they tune them differently.
     
  10. Panohm

    Panohm Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2015
    Likes Received:
    193
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Vancouver, Canadia
    Could be due to the Titanium nozzle of the TG!334, I believe the MH334 Studio reference is meant to address this discrepancy between custom and universal.
     
  11. BlueElephant

    BlueElephant New

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Anything on the westone 4r? I can get a pair (only drivers) for roughly $300 SGD. Was wondering if its considered an upgrade to my Inear SD2.
     
  12. shotgunshane

    shotgunshane Floridian Falcon

    Staff Member Pyrate Flathead IEMW
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    6,358
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clear, clear water
    I haven't heard the 4R but used to own the original 4. Once upon a time I enjoyed the warm and analog-ish Westone house sound. More so than most manufacturers, Westone has a house sounds.

    Almost all their universals have the same basic frequency response. A curved rise in lower mids that extends through mid bass. This gives the Westone signature warmth and bassiness. The next house frequency response is a very large dip in the upper midrange extending through lower treble, that recovers by mid treble with peaks around 10k or so. The size of this dip varies by model and is responsible for the Westone veil some hear.

    This house tuning is meant to be fatigue free and smooth sounding. In my estimation, this is the prototypical 'stage monitor' tuning. If you are looking for something relatively neutral and linear, the only model the Westone lineup that comes close is the 2. Westone hasn't deviated from this formula in years and besides maintaining solid build quality, I feel they have let themselves get left behind the market curve. There are better sounding and better built iems for the same or less money now.
     
  13. Madaboutaudio

    Madaboutaudio Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    545
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Singapore
    Audio Technica IM04:
    These are pretty midcentric, but less midcentric than Noble K10U. They really excel at delivering lush and smooth vocals. Lacks top end airiness and quite weak bass impact. They really suit jazz or symphonic opera genre of music and thats all she wrote. I feel that the IM04 sounds better than Westone 4R, but loses out to the JVC woodies(which has better bass, wider soundstage and more genre compatibility).

    Noble K10U:
    I didn't really enjoy the K10U with the Sony ZX2 as it is not exciting or fun to listen to. K10U is overly lush but has surprisingly good soundstage for BA iem. They will sound good with any genre but won't allow analyse/discern certain details in the music. A jack of all trades but master of none.
     
  14. thesanctified

    thesanctified New

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    3
    I ended up buying a UERM off of a FS forum. I'll have it reshelled by InEarz.
     
  15. KowalskiFUT

    KowalskiFUT New

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2016
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    EU
    How would you compare JH Angie and Rhapsodio Solar. I bought Angie and love her, but Im still worried I could have bought better IEM for same amount of money.
     
  16. shotgunshane

    shotgunshane Floridian Falcon

    Staff Member Pyrate Flathead IEMW
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    6,358
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clear, clear water
    I preferred Angie to the Solar. Angie's midrange is very engaging and vocals, particularly male vocals are really well done- intimate and a little lush. Solar will be fuller and richer. In the lower mid, coloring vocals to be extremely lush and rich.

    I only maxed out bass on Angie once, so I can't recall of it can reach the basshead levels of the Solar but I much prefer the bass on Angie when set around 10:30 or so.

    Both have laid back treble that is probably pretty similar. Unless you want an even thicker note and harder hitting bass, there's really no reason IMO to consider Solar in your case. V2 fit of Angie is far superior to V1.
     
  17. KowalskiFUT

    KowalskiFUT New

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2016
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    EU
    Thanks for your answer. Ive got V2 and fit is great.
     
  18. hauntology

    hauntology New

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2015
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    I was wondering if you've had a chance to listen to the new q-jays? There don't seem to be many options for TWFK-style dual BA monitors any more...
     
  19. shotgunshane

    shotgunshane Floridian Falcon

    Staff Member Pyrate Flathead IEMW
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    6,358
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clear, clear water
    You can read some thoughts here: http://www.head-fi.org/t/785002/jays-q-jays-new-2015-model-north-american-usa-tour

    In a nut shell, I think it greatly benefits from a lot of added impedance, at which point it becomes a baby Angie signature.
     
  20. shotgunshane

    shotgunshane Floridian Falcon

    Staff Member Pyrate Flathead IEMW
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    6,358
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Clear, clear water
    For anyone considering the Deca, I just found out the intro pricing ends Friday. So I'm picking one up. My UERR may be up for sale soon because of it.
     

Share This Page