Mr. Speakers ETHER Flow Headphone(?) Upgrade(?)

Discussion in 'Headphones' started by OJneg, Jul 14, 2016.

  1. AllanMarcus

    AllanMarcus Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Likes Received:
    2,969
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Alamos, NM
    Home Page:
    See #171
    he is considering the Ether Flow C vs the Elear. Isn't the Elear open?
     
  2. Warrior

    Warrior RIP 2021

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Likes Received:
    746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is the difference that big between open and closed cans? I've only heard the hd800, store demo, less than ideal conditions. I didn't ab them with closed cans either.
     
  3. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    90,317
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    Yes. Most, but not all closed cans suck. Ranging from sea-shell reverby coloration, honky mids, strange suckouts at odd spots, overall poorer FR, less airy and constricted headstage. The list goes on.
     
  4. Warrior

    Warrior RIP 2021

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Likes Received:
    746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Damn, didn't realize that. I knew soundstage, but had no idea there were that many differences.
     
  5. AllanMarcus

    AllanMarcus Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Likes Received:
    2,969
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Los Alamos, NM
    Home Page:
    Pretty the main reason to have closed cans is 1) you are a massive bass-head (bass-hole?) or you want some sound isolation (either coming in for from leaking out or both). Open cans don't isolate due to their, well, open nature.

    The Ether C is possibly the best closed headphone there is, although there are some others that some people like (TH900, LCD-XC, ZMFs, T5, ATH-W5000).
     
  6. Warrior

    Warrior RIP 2021

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2016
    Likes Received:
    746
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, that would be I... Basshead, or hole depending on who you chat with.
     
  7. Armaegis

    Armaegis Friend

    Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    7,634
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Winnipeg
    I wasn't thinking in terms of airflow. I was thinking more about the uneven cross sectional air pressure resisting the movement of the diaphragm.
     
  8. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    90,317
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    I doubt the diaphragm moves enough to create any kind of air pressure. The holes on the regular Ether were already pretty big and that design wasn't much different from Bohlender Graebener planar drivers which didn't need special funnels to sound fairly resolving. This is all bullshit conjecture from Dan anyways; and I honestly don't care if funnels create more resolution or whatever other audiophoolistic improvements. None of this matters. All that matters is how it sounds.
     
  9. Armaegis

    Armaegis Friend

    Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    7,634
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Winnipeg
    Of course we all know that sound is just a very localized pressure wave. At a distance, the acoustic wave from the holes is going to be homogenized. In the immediate earspace though, and in between the diaphragm and magnet assembly, I think it potentially does matter. Whether that falls into the realm of audibility however, and whether or not Dan actually did the math or just juryrigged it... *shrug*
     
  10. Hands

    Hands Overzealous Auto Flusher - Measurbator

    Staff Member Pyrate MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    12,287
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Colorado
    Home Page:
    With Jude's and Tyll's measurements both indicating something along the lines of a broad 70Hz-400Hz hump, I am curious if the Ether Flow is going to sound a bit bloated, wooly, and/or overly thick. Perhaps not. Could sound more like the HD650's mid-bass emphasis. I will admit that Tyll's measurements show promise, granted the THD results look like something goofed, but there's a little spike just above 1KHz that could be indicative of ringing (which I noticed on the Ether C, at least).
     
  11. Middy

    Middy Acquaintance

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Birmingham UK
    Bah I put an idea into audeze a year ago about adding holes to the diaphragm to even out distortion. With my total lack of experience and no knowledge of planar or fluid modelling do I get to moan if audeze use something like that?
    I am more for altruism, company or community. Keep biting the hand that feeds you you end up with a Sennheiser Beats monopoly... That was a bad dream....
    On general it's why I like it here, people help even after a kicking.
    I going to upgrade my Ethers to flow as painful as that is. But the decrapifier thread is no different, spend to improve what you have. It would be boring here if it just had the 3 threads Yggdrasil A2 650 800.

    If it isn't too painful on what he decides the upgrade cost is... F*King brexit gonna cost even more....
     
  12. Azteca

    Azteca Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    1,581
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    This did catch my attention. From Tyll's flow measurements.

    [​IMG]
     
  13. MuZo2

    MuZo2 Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    8
    THD measurement is wrong?
     
  14. Tyll Hertsens

    Tyll Hertsens Grandpappy of the hobby - Special Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2015
    Likes Received:
    2,805
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Bozeman Montana
    Home Page:
    Yeah, THD looks wonky to me. I'll remeasure when I get a production unit. And yes, that impulse response is stunning. I'm surprised it doesn't quite image as well as the HD 800. Lots of new things to listen for on these cans.
     
  15. Hands

    Hands Overzealous Auto Flusher - Measurbator

    Staff Member Pyrate MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    12,287
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Colorado
    Home Page:
    Yeah, Jude had much better results, and the Ether not-Flow had better results. Wouldn't be the first time Tyll's rig goofed THD results recently. I would be astounded if the Flow changes fucked up distortion that bad. I mean, sure, can't rule out a bad pair or something, but measurement rig probably farted during the tests is all. Is it going to have the lowest, bestest results of all time? I dunno.

    Yeah, but zoom in and expand the measured time, and does the impulse continue to wiggle over time like most planars? ;)

    I have yet to hear a planar image as well as a good dynamic, and the stock Ether was particularly bad with imaging to begin with IMO.
     
  16. JewBear

    JewBear Almost "Made"

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    270
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Tyll,

    Are they going to send you the Ether C flow eventually?
     
  17. Systems77

    Systems77 New

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2016
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    3
    I have the Ether Cs and the lows are nonexistent. just flat and horrendous if I increase via EQ it distorts. For what I paid for these headphones they flat out suck. That's my opinion. I end up giving up on them and grabbing something else almost every time I pull them out and this is across every piece of hardware I plug them into. The listening experience is this... where are the lows? turn up the volume --adjust this and that... damn it's just loud and painful now... & I'm still missing decent lows. I grab another pair of cans... ahh there we go!
     
  18. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    90,317
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    The problem with Jude's THD measurements is that we don't know what level they were taken at. Granted there are going to be differences in how SPL is measured, and a good amount of variability inherent with the distortion tests (even with repeated tests on the same rig, depends on the methodology, etc.); but there is no such thing as a THD measurement without specifying level of the fundamental tone. Jude's THD measurements are basically useless. Me spraying a line of piss across a piece of paper would be no worse as THD measurement. Jude has zero technical knowledge and has in the past publicly denounced my measurements and misrepresented by beliefs on how they should be used. Nothing more dangerous than a disingenuous idiot taking measurements.
     
    Last edited: Jul 20, 2016
  19. Serious

    Serious Inquisitive Frequency Response Plot

    Pyrate BWC MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    2,642
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    near Munich, Germany
    He also plots his THD graphs down to 0.000001% which tells me he either has no idea WTF the limits of his measuring rig are or that he doesn't know how to plot graphs.
     
  20. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    90,317
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    Well, he does make it very obvious that he has a $30,000 measurement rig. He probably had a Faraday cage installed too. That last one was an inside joke. Bonus points to whomever can explain it.
     

Share This Page