Gustard X26 Pro Measurements

Discussion in 'Digital: DACs, USB converters, decrapifiers' started by GoldenOne, Jul 12, 2021.

  1. GoldenOne

    GoldenOne Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2020
    Likes Received:
    582
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    England
    Gustard X26 Pro: https://aoshida-audio.com/products/gustard-dac-x26-pro

    20210712_182959.jpg

    Test Setup:
    - Audio Precision APx555 B-Series Analyzer with 200kOhm input impedance
    - Van Damme Star-Quad shielded SPC XLR cables with Amphenol Connectors
    - USB Source: AMD PC via ifi iGalvanic 3.0
    - Audioquest Carbon USB and SPDIF cables
    - All measurements shown in this post are taken with SPDIF input, 44.1khz sample rate and stock 'vivid' filter unless otherwise noted (other input/filter measurements available in reports)
    - Full reports containing additional data and test configurations are attached
    - Exact analyzer/filter configurations for each measurement are detailed in the full reports
    - APx Project is included in the reports folder should anyone wish to repeat this set of measurements or use it for another DAC

    ChitChat:

    This DAC is an interesting one, it's quite pricey at about $1500, and offers a few extra/unusual features. It's not quite the same 'insert ESS chip and Opamp here for 122dB SINAD' design, with 10Mhz clock input support, a discrete Class A output stage (with analog LPF) , and a fair amount of extra DSP and clock related stuff.

    As a result, this costs twice the price of something such as a D1SE. Whether that is worth it is another question. At $1500 it's knocking on the door of a lot of very well regarded DACs like the Yggdrasil, Spring 3 etc.

    If there are any other measurements you'd like to see they're most likely in the reports. But if not, let me know and I'll add them to my sequence for future tests.

    If anyone sees any issues with any measurements or configs please let me know and they'll be addressed.

    FULL REPORTS:

    Reports available here: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Lvy6m79jos2vK-kiipRGUW8aSd0nMpX7?usp=sharing

    Reports contain the following measurements:

    - 1khz Sine View
    - 15khz Sine View
    - -90.31dBfs Sine View
    - Phase Response
    - Filter Ultrasonic Attenuation
    - 20hz-90khz RMS Noise Level
    - Device Output Level (Vrms)
    - 20hz-20khz Noise RMS Level
    - Idle Noise FFT
    - 1khz FFT (0dBfs and -3dBfs)
    - 50hz FFT (0dBfs and -3dBfs)
    - Effective Number of Bits (0dBfs and -3dBfs)
    - THD+N (0dBfs and -3dBfs)
    - THD+N / Frequency
    - Dynamic Range (AES17)
    - SNR
    - IMD (SMPTE)
    - 50hz/7khz IMD SMPTE FFT
    - IMD SMPTE vs Output Level
    - Linearity
    - Linearity (No Bandpass)
    - SINAD/Output Level
    - Crosstalk / Frequency
    - DC Offset when Active
    - DC Offset when Idle
    - 44.1khz Jitter
    - 48khz Jitter
    - 90khz Bandwidth test
    - 32 Tone FFT
    - 1.2Mhz Bandwidth Noise FFT
    - 1.2Mhz Bandwidth 1khz FFT (0dBfs and -3dBfs)
    - And more!


    Dynamic Range (AES17): 125.4dB

    SNR: 127dB

    Noise Level RMS (20-20khz): 2.264uVrms

    Noise Level RMS (20-90khz): 4.405uVrms

    DC Offset: 567uV Active, 461uV idle


    1khz 0dBfs:

    ezKbpTodCW.png

    Pretty crazy THD+N performance, BUT:

    1khz -3dBfs:
    SINAD/THD+N: 119.718 (L) / 119.523 (R)
    upload_2021-7-13_1-37-45.png

    Actual SINAD figure is still very good, but it is rather odd that once we stop playing a full scale signal the 3rd harmonic in particular is suddenly almost 15dB higher.....
    Not sure if this is an unintentional quirk or something done specifically to optimise for looking good in test conditions.

    THD+N / Frequency:

    upload_2021-7-13_1-40-51.png

    Linearity:

    upload_2021-7-13_1-41-15.png

    SINAD/THD+N vs output level:

    upload_2021-7-13_1-41-48.png
    upload_2021-7-13_1-41-58.png
    upload_2021-7-13_1-42-5.png

    IMD (SMPTE) vs Output Level:

    upload_2021-7-13_1-42-38.png
    upload_2021-7-13_1-42-44.png
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 6
    • Epic Epic x 1
    • List
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2021
  2. GoldenOne

    GoldenOne Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2020
    Likes Received:
    582
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    England
    Crosstalk:

    upload_2021-7-13_1-51-44.png


    -90.31dBfs 1khz Sine (Recorded with 192khz ADC Sample Rate):

    upload_2021-7-13_1-52-0.png


    Filter Ultrasonic Attenuation:

    upload_2021-7-13_1-52-8.png

    Gustard says this is a custom/proprietary filter, but it seems to be identical to ESS Fast Linear filter.

    D1SE 'Fast Linear' vs Gustard 'Vivid' filter, can you tell which is which?
    upload_2021-7-13_1-54-8.png

    Impulse Response:

    Vivid:
    upload_2021-7-13_1-54-53.png

    Gentle:
    upload_2021-7-13_1-55-3.png

    Composite:
    upload_2021-7-13_1-55-14.png

    Gustard also says it 'supports NOS'. Which is confusing because...well..you can't really run a delta sigma dac in 'NOS'.
    Looks like the 'NOS' option is basically a VERY short minphase filter:
    upload_2021-7-13_1-56-24.png

    Was sort of expecting a Zero-Order-Hold filter on this one similar to RME's 'NOS/Super-Slow' filter on the ADI-2 which does actually produce a result similar to what you'd expect from a NOS dac.
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2021
  3. GoldenOne

    GoldenOne Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2020
    Likes Received:
    582
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    England
    Idle Noise Spectrum upto 1.2Mhz:

    upload_2021-7-13_2-0-35.png

    Analog Low Pass FIlter:
    Gustard mentioned the analog low-pass filter so I checked that, 192khz input
    upload_2021-7-13_2-1-50.png

    44.1khz Jitter (USB):
    (SPDIF 44.1khz jitter was almost identical)
    upload_2021-7-13_2-2-38.png

    48khz Jitter (USB):

    upload_2021-7-13_2-3-14.png

    Great jitter performance here, though it wasn't as good on SPDIF input:

    upload_2021-7-13_2-3-55.png

    Multitone:

    No matter what I did, I struggled to get a result on this test where the <200hz region wasn't overly high. This is one of the best results, many of them had noise upto about -100dB.
    I'm not entirely sure if this is a measurement configuration issue or the DAC. I've encountered it with other DACs sometimes, but in those cases just running the test again or enabling frequency shift correction sorts it.

    With the X26 Pro, I really struggled to get this test to work properly so take this with a grain of salt as this is very much a cherrypicked screenshot:
    upload_2021-7-13_2-4-46.png
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 1
    • List
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2021
  4. GoldenOne

    GoldenOne Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2020
    Likes Received:
    582
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    England
    Reserved 3
     
  5. GoldenOne

    GoldenOne Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2020
    Likes Received:
    582
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    England
    Reserved 4
     
  6. dllmsch

    dllmsch Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2016
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Molvanîa
    AFAIK the owner of gustard got hold of an APx555 while designing this amp, so the amp should look really good in ASR style measurements. However X26Pro have quite good of a reputation among Chinese subjectivists as well, wonder how it fares against schiit and holo audio's offerings subjectively.
     
  7. Marvey

    Marvey Super Friend

    Staff Member Friend BWC
    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2021
    Likes Received:
    1,661
    Trophy Points:
    93
    [​IMG]

    That impulse response will mean a roll off in the highs of the audio passband. In essence, it would mimic that particular NOS characteristic. However, I suspect part of the NOS sound with some NOS DACs is the anti-aliasing / reconstruction filter being implemented at the headamp or headphone itself - LOL - which maybe explains the dense timbre deal.

    upload_2021-7-13_8-28-51.png

    I wonder if this is endemic to ESS chips and related to what many people hear as the "Sabre" highs or digititus - granted the latest and greatest from ESS seems to have calmer highs than their prior generation. Now I would be curious to see if how far these harmonics extend past 20kHz.

    They are different sounding. I don't see the X26 as sounding significantly different from the Matrix X-Sabre. I think @Vtory may have had both X26 and X-Sabre. They may be small differences, but these two DACs will have a strong family sound. @ChaChaRealSmooth after listening to an Yggdrasil GS said to me "why da F did you let me buy the X-Sabre?". LOL, I replied that he pretty much needed to figure it out for himself. (I did feel the X-Sabre was good sounding DAC). @Vtory was on a ESS DAC tear, until he met the Soekris.

    It's a matter of preference. I think in this community there is a strong preference toward the resistor ladder / resistor string DACs. The ESS stuff can be good. I really like the MOTU Ultralite, it's almost not an ESS sound, but I suspect their engineers may have whispered it. I should take measurements of the MOTU.
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 7
    • Respectively Disagree Respectively Disagree x 1
    • List
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 13, 2021
  8. Walderstorn

    Walderstorn Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2016
    Likes Received:
    1,212
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Europe
    Very interesting review that is now up on Youtube so check @GoldenOne 's channel.
    For those, of us, with medium budgets, this can be an even more interesting review.
     
  9. Merrick

    Merrick A lidless ear

    Friend
    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2016
    Likes Received:
    8,462
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I checked out when the timbre was described as slightly off, needing a bit more body.
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 2
    • List
  10. mitochondrium

    mitochondrium Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2017
    Likes Received:
    719
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    A Cell
    Not specifally for the X26. But I am wondering what the 10 MHz Clock can bring to the table when the Jitter test via USB is already performing quite well.

    @GoldenOne you would not happen to have a REF 10 or other 10 Mhz clock lying around you could hook up to the X26 and compare jitter of USB and spdif with and without 10 Mhz clock. In some parts people swear by reclocking, I have a hard time imagining that this would make a big measurable difference in the J-test and even if it did whether it would make a noticeable audible difference. I have to admit, I do not know whether the J-test is a little like SINAD in that it does not tell you the whole story and a 10 Mhz clock may yield audible improvements without showing a difference in the J-test.
     
  11. GoldenOne

    GoldenOne Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2020
    Likes Received:
    582
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    England
    I'd definitely like to experiment with a 10mhz clock. Both with some dacs and some ddcs.

    Unfortunately I don't have one and they're usually VERY expensive so unlikely to be able to do so unless mutec or someone is happy to lend one.
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 1
    • List

Share This Page