Schiit Jotunheim Measurements

Discussion in 'Headphone Amplifier Measurements' started by purr1n, Sep 16, 2016.

  1. purr1n

    purr1n Finding his inner redneck

    Staff Member Friend BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    73,352
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    Schiit Jotunheim Measurements

    Too much hype around this amp, so I figured let's take an objective look, beyond all the subjective impressions. NOTE: @atomicbob already provided his measurements. He has better measurement gear than I do, but I wanted to at least provide another look.

    Too many wires danging with alligator clips from 4pin XLR, so excuse the spurious signals. Using the Modi 2 / AKM 4490 DAC as the signal generator (as with previous measurements here, well some may be been from the Modi 2 with the older chip). So SE input from DAC.

    The 1kHz measurement is too close to call - that is to say if there is even any measurable distortion. 99.9db or more below the fundamental and close to the noise floor. Maybe we can say there is a little bit of 2nd order? Like 0.001%? Maybe? Finally, ignore the 12k and 6k spurs on the 50Hz measurement. More 3rd order in 50Hz, but makes sense for balanced. All of my measurements seem to have that - related to the DAC sampling rate 48kHz and resolution of the FFT.

    1kHz @ ~0.550Vrms (using /10 diff. probe) into 330 ohms BALANCED OUT HIGH GAIN
    jot 1k.png

    3kHz @ ~0.550Vrms (using /10 diff. probe) into 330 ohms BALANCED OUT HIGH GAIN

    jot 3k.png

    50Hz @ ~0.550Vrms (using /10 diff. probe) into 330 ohms BALANCED OUT HIGH GAIN
    jot 50Hz.png
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 8
    • List
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2016
  2. purr1n

    purr1n Finding his inner redneck

    Staff Member Friend BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    73,352
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    IMD... NOT... Same conditions as above.

    jot 6-17.png
    jot 5-70.png
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 5
    • List
  3. Ash1412

    Ash1412 Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Where was that guy who was looking for distortion-less amps? Maybe we should invite him back just to show him this beast.
     
  4. purr1n

    purr1n Finding his inner redneck

    Staff Member Friend BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    73,352
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    Even given the circumstances, mess of exposed wires, and the spurious signals, the results are incredible, especially with IMD. From the first time I've heard it, and this was several years ago, I thought the design was super duper clean and zippy. Measurements don't always show everything, or all aspects of sound quality, but distortion measurement do show subjective "clean" much very so. Schiit's been sitting on this for a while and everybody should be glad that they finally released it. I've been waiting a long time for this.

    Check out @atomicbob's measurements too. His measurements have a far lower noise floor and less spurs - where you can see even more 0.00000 kind of stuff.

    P.S. Doh! I just realized why no evidence of 60Hz, 120Hz, from power...
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 5
    • List
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2016
  5. murray

    murray Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2015
    Likes Received:
    390
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    N.Z.
    Difference in "noise floor" on FFT charts can be due to processing gain (from difference in FFT size). For instance, your 16384 FFT will push the apparent noise floor down by 39dB. Every doubling of the FFT size will add another 3dB of processing gain. I have quickly re-read @atomicbob's measurements, but can't see what size his was. It's just another consideration for "apples to apples" comparison.
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 3
    • List
  6. murray

    murray Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2015
    Likes Received:
    390
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    N.Z.
    Oh, and by the way, great measurement results. It puts years of DIY effort to shame. Time was when one would put in the sweat and toil because the great amps were far too expensive and it was easy to improve on the cheaper offerings.
     
  7. GoodEnoughGear

    GoodEnoughGear Evil Dr. Shultz‎

    Friend
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    2,679
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Cape Town, South Africa
    This has to bode well for the 2-channel stuff coming |\/|.
     
  8. purr1n

    purr1n Finding his inner redneck

    Staff Member Friend BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    73,352
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    For reference. A comparison of voltage vs. distortion for several amps. The data is spotty, but I sort of took these in my spare time here and there. Sort of a pain without automated / dedicated equipment to do this kind of stuff. The Jotunheim results are limited by noise floor than anything else, so that's why we get screwy results toward the lower voltage levels.

    Dummy load of 330 ohms. BTW, 500 mV output into Sennheiser HD650s is very loud!

    Voltage RMS vs THD, Load = 330 ohms, Highest Gain used
    X axis = mV, Y axis = THD (0.01 = 1%)

    powercomp.png
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 16
    • List
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2016
  9. Walderstorn

    Walderstorn Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2016
    Likes Received:
    1,115
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Europe
    This is incredibly impressive.
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 1
    • List
  10. Bitter

    Bitter Acquaintance

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2016
    Likes Received:
    86
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Indeed, didn't notice the logarithmic scale at first.
     
  11. schiit

    schiit SchiitHead

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    8,151
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Newhall, CA and Corpus Christi, TX
    Home Page:
    Yaaaay! I did something right (for a change.) (Maybe.)

    Brackets indicate typical engineering thoughts.
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 16
    • List
  12. schiit

    schiit SchiitHead

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    8,151
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Newhall, CA and Corpus Christi, TX
    Home Page:
    (And, Marv, it's a pain with or without automated equipment. You have to watch the Stanfords to make sure you didn't change reference values (very easy to do) or that it didn't crash after a couple of automated SNR runs (or similar). "Hey, I got 126.1dB SNR!" sometimes means, Yeah, referenced to 40V RMS," or "Hey, the analyzer has taken a dump!" Actually, usually that's what a measurement like that means.)
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 5
    • List
  13. SSL

    SSL Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Likes Received:
    1,244
    Trophy Points:
    93
    ...so let's make some more, he says.
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 2
    • List
  14. purr1n

    purr1n Finding his inner redneck

    Staff Member Friend BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    73,352
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    Heeheehee. Well, I just wanted to make sure we were being objective about it too. At least with these results, if anybody accused us of being biased or of groupthink, we can retort back that they have shitty ears. I'm not surprised at these results, I heard it a mile away. So did many others.
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 1
    • List
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2016
  15. Armaegis

    Armaegis Friend

    Friend BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    4,592
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Winnipeg
    As an engineer and teacher, this is my constant insecurity. Like okay, I did a thing, it seems to work, people seem to like it... or do they??? or hey I just tutored your kid for the last month in trigonometry and they've got a test coming up, they should be fine... I hope...
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 7
    • List
  16. Poleepkwa

    Poleepkwa Friend

    Friend BWC
    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Likes Received:
    1,311
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Finland
    I assume Schiit will never offer any of their amps as DIY kits? I would love to build something like this...
     
  17. Hrodulf

    Hrodulf Prohibited from acting as an MOT until year 2050

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    3,691
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are a few amps with pretty good specs. Take Sjostrom QRV08 for example or Neurochrome HP-1.
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 2
    • List
  18. AstralStorm

    AstralStorm Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Likes Received:
    94
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Can we get the phono module tested? This would simplify a step in my work while being a great DAC and amp too!

    Now... pity there is no switch on the RIAA module. But maybe someone can make a variant flat XLR module.
     
    Last edited: Jan 6, 2017
  19. AstralStorm

    AstralStorm Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Likes Received:
    94
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Never mind, the purpose of the RIAA module is for phono listening.

    In case I would want one, which preamp would do RIAA and be comparable? Yet upcoming?
     
  20. RonShaun

    RonShaun Rando

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2016
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    3
    So I was wondering, if the jotunheim has such good distortion measurements, what makes it so "shrilly" compared to other amps? Take for example, the jotunheim paired the hd 800: the amp somehow amplifies that annoying 6Khz peak rather than leave it be. Can someone explain why this happens?
     
    • Like / Agree Like / Agree x 1
    • List

Share This Page