The HD800 & HD800S thread

Discussion in 'Headphones' started by sorrodje, Oct 11, 2015.

  1. Maxvla

    Maxvla Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    118
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    OKC
    Perhaps it is just the way I hear, but your characterization of the sound stage is completely foreign to me. I find it is extremely precise with many distinct layers and depths so that I know exactly where instruments are and the boundaries of the space (or lack thereof such as with electronic music).

    Most speaker setups don't come close to this, and they end up a wall of sound.
     
  2. paranoidroid

    paranoidroid Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2015
    Likes Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    San Francisco
    I think the layering and width of sound stage is good (the best?) but the instruments just lack a certain solidity somehow. It's like I can sense where the instrument are and distinguish them but I visualize them as fuzzy transparent ghosts, despite knowing where they are. That's where I sense and describe as 'diffuseness'. Just the way I hear it. I would have never thought this until I got used to how the HE1000 images things, so this is how I hear the HD800 relative to the HE1000.
     
  3. Priidik

    Priidik MOT: Estelon

    Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    2,213
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Estonia
    I think if I had never been exposed to HD800 I would probably still use some pro audio soundcard as source with my Genelecs. In retrospect I'd say my speaker rig scaled many levels up from what it were, pretty much neck to neck with HD800.

    The speaker rig had solid images with entry level source (kind of) but lacked spacing which one would still get from HD800 with lackluster Sabre dac, but without the solidity and note weight. Once higher up in the food chain the presentation is shockingly similar bw the two.
     
  4. cooperpwc

    cooperpwc Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    China
    @The Alchemist: I will see your Ozone 6 and raise you an Ozone 7. :) Just the standard version for $199 is amazing. The Dynamic Equalizer combines a limiter with an equalizer. It has to be experienced to be believed - truly sophisticated technology that obsoletes the Equalizer module for my purposes. I am kind of back and forth between it and the Dynamics (i.e. pure limiter) module for taming treble on the HD800. Both work very well. I love the flat UI too (like Ozone 6). It really is an impressive piece of software.
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2015
  5. The Alchemist

    The Alchemist MOT: Schiit - Here to help!

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    1,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The SchiitR
    Home Page:
    @cooperpwc Oh cool -I had no idea Ozone 7 was out! Thanks for the heads-up! :bow:

    I'll have to try the demo!
     
  6. cooperpwc

    cooperpwc Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    China
    The Ozone 7 Dynamic Equalizer is remarkable for correcting frequency offences of the HD800. This treble setting (Band 5) will remove anywhere from 0 to 8 dB (theoretically) centered on 6.4 Kh, adjusting continuously with the signal. It has the precision of an equalizer with the flexibility of a limiter.

    Band 1.png

    (I also have two milder settings. This is 8 dB with a 40 dB threshold. 7 dB with a 35 dB threshold is also very useful for less hard-hitting music. My 6 / 30 setting does not get much use.)

    I am now addressing it with a mild boost, as well as fixing a notch that my HD800 has centered on 250 Hz.
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2015
  7. cooperpwc

    cooperpwc Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    China
    The correct settings will depend on one's HD800. The certificate is available online from Sennheiser. This is mine.

    HD800 Certificate.png

    (And it is not a mechanical exercise. For example, my bass notch looks to be centered around 260 Hz but centering correction on 250 Hz sounds better. I also did better with a lower Q, i.e. wider correction, than expected.)
     
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2015
  8. Hekeli

    Hekeli Facebook Friend

    Contributor
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Finland
    Rotfl using Sennheiser "certs" for tuning?

    How are they usable? You actually hear a notch? Both charts are from my HD800, latter measured on my head with in-ear mics.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Bill-P

    Bill-P Level 42 Mad Wizard

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    4,804
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Ouch... that peak looks like it'll hurt very very badly!
     
  10. cooperpwc

    cooperpwc Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    China
    @Hekeli I did find it to be a useful starting point. I experiment to arrive at the minimum correction and maximum benefit. What I hear is the improvement which is tangible to my tastes.
     
  11. rayfalkner

    rayfalkner Not to be confused with Roy Fokker - Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Likes Received:
    170
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Jakarta
    Your forgot the accompanying pic, Bill;

    [​IMG]
     
  12. Hekeli

    Hekeli Facebook Friend

    Contributor
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Finland
    Might as well run a sine sweep and listen that as a base, probably 253 times more useful. Just sayin.
     
  13. maibuN

    maibuN Guest

    Is this a system-wide EQ or just a player with an EQ?
     
  14. The Alchemist

    The Alchemist MOT: Schiit - Here to help!

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    1,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The SchiitR
    Home Page:
    Ozone 7 is actually designed to be a mastering software plug-in for a DAW. However, any music player that will accept a VST plug-in you can use Ozone mastering software. Usually the only thing you would use from the program is the EQ (unless using the mastering applications for pre-mastered songs you create), however Ozone has:

    Maximizer | Dynamic EQ | Vintage Limiter | Vintage Tape | Vintage Compressor | Vintage EQ | Presets
    Dynamics | Codec Preview | Export Formats | Standalone Application | Equalizer and Post Equalizer
    Exciter | Imager | Dither | Intelligent Visual Metering | Workflow Highlights

    You can read more about it here:

    https://www.izotope.com/en/products/mixing-mastering/ozone/
     
  15. cooperpwc

    cooperpwc Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    China
    Indeed. I would only amend that the Dynamic EQ module in Ozone 7 has entirely replaced the EQ module for playback equalization IMO. It is really impressive.

    Another nice thing about Ozone 7 is that the primary modules are no longer dumbed down in the less expensive version. You get the full features for Dynamic EQ and other primary modules for $249. (It was on sale for $199 when I bought it just a few days ago but I see that this has ended...) There is no reason to buy the more expensive $499 version for using with a music player.

    FYI In the old days, Ozone 5 was $499 / $999 with the cheaper version having dumbed down features even on the main modules. Ozone 7 is also much better across the board.
     
  16. The Alchemist

    The Alchemist MOT: Schiit - Here to help!

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    1,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The SchiitR
    Home Page:
    I agree with @cooperpwc . If using the program for a music player, you only need the primary modules. Since I write, record, and produce music, I use almost all of the modules for mastering - but those are for songs I create myself that are not mastered. Songs that are already mastered i.e. retail songs - really only need the primary modules i.e. the Dynamic EQ.
     
  17. cooperpwc

    cooperpwc Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    China
    I am back to using the Dynamics module in Ozone 7, i.e. a straight-up limiter, to smooth the treble spikes on the HD800. It and the Dynamic Equalizer are both excellent - I have been going back and forth between them - but right now the limiter is striking me as especially smooth and natural.

    (I am leaving bass au naturel; I like it as is.)

    D 10 35.jpg

    Edit: As I informed The Alchemist, I have moved the Thresholds up to -30 dB, i.e. reducing the effect of the limiter slightly.
     
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2015
  18. The Alchemist

    The Alchemist MOT: Schiit - Here to help!

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    1,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The SchiitR
    Home Page:
    Awesome @cooperpwc! Now that I have Ozone 7 Advanced in my JRiver MC 21 - I am going to have to try your settings. If you have time, do me a favor an PM me your exact settings as you have now (Dynamic EQ, Regular EQ (if you use it), Limiter etc. I would be extremely grateful!
     
  19. cooperpwc

    cooperpwc Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2015
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    China
    @Th
    You got mail. ;)
     
  20. The Alchemist

    The Alchemist MOT: Schiit - Here to help!

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    1,189
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The SchiitR
    Home Page:

Share This Page