A music venue here is streaming archived concerts (live music is off due to virus). They were using Youtube, now they are using Facebook. I think that, despite my poor hearing, I can detect a difference. What I am getting reminds me of the days when I used to test bit-rate differences...
I have no data on this (other than my own ears) but that has been my experience as well. Facebook, even with "better" equipment (some of the livestreams are just horrible) doesn't sound quite as good to me.
Facebook sucks for audio and video, it's really just a convenience thing with them.
YouTube videos I believe top out at 126kbps AAC while YouTube *Music* maxes out at 256kbps AAC, which is good enough for me as long as I'm not going full audiophile.
Listening again today. Nice concert. But there is that /effect/. It is like it lacks depth. But it is listenable, so hey, perhaps my hearing is worse again today! lol
Anyway, thanks for the confirmation that my anecdotal experience might actually be data!
Read these "rules" AND introduce
yourself before your first post
Being true to what the artists intended
(opinion / entertainment piece)
Comments on Profile Post by Thad E Ginathom