Comments on Profile Post by GoldfishX

  1. gsanger
    gsanger
    Huh, interesting. About a week ago I also heard my first Maggies, 1.7 too. I thought they were a bit rolled in the highs, but liked the imaging, and it didn't trigger my tinnitus. Thought bass was "meh" and could benefit from a sub. Liked them overall, though - loved the transients. Crazy how two people can hear things so differently.
    Feb 22, 2025
    GoldfishX likes this.
  2. GoldfishX
    GoldfishX
    I mean, "textured bass" is the polite way of saying "it's fine". For imaging, they lacked depth. The 2D image was good. The classical stuff I played fared better than the rock/jazz material. I know they were getting about 400wpc (into 4ohms...it was a Hegel into a preamp) and a high end Berkeley DAC was doing the conversation, but I had little control over the chain.
    Feb 22, 2025
    gsanger likes this.
  3. Armaegis
    Armaegis
    I always have a love/hate auditioning planar speakers because I'm almost positive the tizzy raggedness I'm hearing is reflections off the rear/front walls.
    Feb 22, 2025
    gsanger and GoldfishX like this.
  4. roshambo123
    roshambo123
    I think I heard some Magnepans at the Schitter awhile ago. Didn't like the timbre or the way they sounded.
    Feb 22, 2025
    gsanger likes this.
  5. darmok
    darmok
    Demoed at the local dealer in a treated room. I would say they were bright, but definitely lean. Much too lean for my tastes.
    Feb 22, 2025
    gsanger likes this.
  6. Kernel Kurtz
    Kernel Kurtz
    I like planar, electrostatic and bipolar dynamic speakers specifically because of the direct/reflected sound signature. You can't just plop them down though, you have to put a lot of thought into placement and even then they are, um, polarizing. Always good to have choices though.
    Feb 22, 2025
    joch and gsanger like this.
  7. GoldfishX
    GoldfishX
    I think "lean" is what I would have been okay with in an apartment, but I don't think the payoff for making them work was there (I think a tube integrated would have been a longshot to improve what I heard). Will probably stick with bookshelves and headphones for now.
    Feb 22, 2025
  8. Tchoupitoulas
    Tchoupitoulas
    I heard the 1.7 at CAF and found them bright and fatiguing; they had a shit room though, long and now, with the speakers facing across the narrow side. I wonder if they'd have sounded better 15' back, not 6' away.
    Feb 22, 2025
    GoldfishX likes this.
  9. GoldfishX
    GoldfishX
    My potential room is long and narrow, but the audition room was wide open. In the middle of a large square (I was right in the sweet spot, maybe 6 feet away). I'm skeptical if their nature changes that much, to overcome the overall meh.
    Feb 22, 2025
  10. GoldfishX
    GoldfishX
    I also want to be clear...I'm a fan of their look and affordability and their business model/longevity. I think people should give them a try. They just didn't cut it for me, sound-wise.
    Feb 22, 2025
    Pocomo likes this.